One of our major focuses at Massey & Martin, LLC is the Student Success & Remediation, in which we guide Pharmacy Program administrators in assessing incoming students, offering those at risk of academic difficulty a chance to engage in prematriculation and, if necessary, organized remediation programs their didactic year of Pharmacy education.
We see the current approach to student remediation in most Pharmacy programs following a recurring, and largely unhelpful, pattern:
Yet often this method fails because core problems are not addressed; a student with no time-management skills will not develop them merely because a re-test is offered. In such a case, one is simply hoping that a few extra days for this beleaguered student to squeeze in...
In our last blog, we introduced the concept of the Student Skills Development Program. In effect, this is your Pharmacy program’s chance to jump in ahead of academic difficulties that some of your students may encounter during their didactic year. Once incorporated, such a program will increase the probability of your students thriving academically and successfully graduating.
A Student Skills Development Program begins with the admissions process. Perhaps your Pharmacy program wants to admit students who don’t quite “fit the mold.” They may have a lower GPA, a history of academic difficulty, or a spotty academic record. Perhaps your program wants to admit a student who meets the program’s mission, is racially diverse, or comes from a lower social-economic geographic area. If these students appear to be at risk before ever admitting them, what can your program do?
Increasing inclusion and diversity to encompass students from all backgrounds requires a...
In our previous blog, we discussed the value of using data to determine which Pharmacy students are “at-risk” for struggling in their education, along with the idea of pre-matriculation education modules to help even the playing field for those students. It is immediately apparent, however, that while this is a beneficial step for students who have been flagged as being “at risk,” it might also miss a number of students who will quite simply have difficulties because Pharmacy education is difficult.
The truth is that experiencing growing pains upon entering Pharmacy education is not uncommon, even for students with exceedingly high GPAs. Students experience difficulty when adjusting to the vast amount of information required to learn in Pharmacy education, to the rigors of the didactic year, which may be quite different than their previous education, or merely to the stress of graduate-level studies.
Setting aside the various other reasons students may...
We have discussed previously the usefulness of metacognition in graduate-level teaching and learning. By practicing metacognition, we become aware of the amazing amount of work our minds do. We then use our particular skills to successfully employ high-level learning when we can and seek assistance or innovation when we cannot.
To introduce metacognition to students we employ three critical steps:
We introduce these three steps, then reinforce them to students repeatedly over the course of their Pharmacy education through the Student Success Coaching Model through:
The Student Success Model incorporates three basic methods of facilitating metacognition:
These are exciting times, and PA education is rapidly changing and pivoting. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the ARC-PA’s 5th Edition Standards, which set the expectations for PA programs and the requirements for their operation. Understanding and complying with these Standards can make the difference between a successful commission action and an adverse decision leading to probation for the program.
We developed the following chart from information gathered from the ARC-PA commission’s website. In reviewing it, we can see that in the years from 2015 through 2020, citations have dramatically increased under the C-Standards, particularly Standards C1.01 (The program must implement an ongoing program self-assessment process that is designed to document program effectiveness and foster program improvement); and C2.01 (The program must prepare a Self-Study Report as part of the application for continuing accreditation that accurately and succinctly documents the...
I am pleased that you are joining me in this new segment of my series, in which I’ll be guiding you through some advanced assessment methods for your PA program’s data.
The situation at hand is this: PA programs must implement a comprehensive assessment process to ensure compliance with 5th Edition Standards and ensure annual completion of all components of Appendix 14. In our “5th Edition Standards” blog series and webinar, we carefully unpack the various sections of Appendix 14 for you to better understand what the commission wants and how you can manage the intimidating amount of data you are required to collect to respond to their requirements.
Data collection is usually considered a chore. Teaching responsibilities, scholarship, and service already stretch faculty thin. I have been in PA education for 32 years and I know what it is like to have teaching responsibilities among others, and then you have assessment on top of it all. Finding time for...
As I continue this blog series on advanced assessment methods for your PA program’s data, I have been emphasizing different ways we can look at sets of data so that we can extrapolate correlations from them. In today’s blog, I will share two more assessments I find valuable: stratification and the heat map. The beauty of these processes is that – assuming there is reliable data within - they are extremely easy to read and understand.
Let us look at the application for these.
Stratification allows us to differentiate several levels of scoring across a data set. Below, we have the stratification of a program’s previous two cohorts when it came to their PANCE score ranges. Green obviously is good; red is not good. There were eight failures. We can see that PACKRAT I, Summ I, Summ II, and Packrat II, EORE and EOCE test scores across the board are worse for those students who failed. But those twenty-three students that were strong, over 500,...
Thank you for joining me once more for my current blog series regarding advanced assessment methods for the data gathered by your PA program. One of our main purposes behind conducting the advanced assessment is to fulfill the requests of the ARC-PA commission as you are completing your SSR. The Commission desires that you show the linkage between your appendix sections. Doing so demonstrates your understanding of the complexity of a PA program and how all the factors interrelate.
I will give examples here using spider diagrams, a straightforward way of visualizing how many factors relate to one key process. This is similar in theory to the cause-and-effect mapping that I discussed in my previous blog. In that scenario, we attempted to trace a problem back to its root cause. You may use an illustration such as the one below in conjunction with cause-and-effect mapping, for example, to determine which variables to include on a cause-and-effect map. But knowing interrelationships is...
Thank you for joining me once more as I continue my blog series on advanced assessment methods for the data collected by your PA program. Today we will begin seeing the practical applications of advanced assessment, starting with the basics: cause and effect.
When your PA program fails to meet a benchmark, the natural response is to question why. Where did we go wrong? What must change? What must improve? But until we find the root cause of the problem – in fact, if there even is a root cause – devising a solution will be equivalent to throwing darts at a board. Your solution may hit the target, may come close, or maybe be on the wrong side of the board altogether, and you will have to wait through another cohort, or several more cohorts, to understand whether your solution solved anything.
Instead, I propose using advanced assessment to find relationships between collected data, to pinpoint where a problem originates, and define solutions and interventions.
Let us look...
Welcome back to my blog series on using advanced assessment methods in the interpretation of the data your program collects. The ARC-PA Commission requires that you collect and present this to them; advanced assessment means deriving two different benefits.
First, your SSR will be a better representation of what the committee wants to see.
Remember that advanced assessment does not “replace” the minimum requirements for the SSR.
Nor does the accrediting body require you to go deep into statistical analysis on the parametric level. Nevertheless, it can be highly beneficial to do so. One thing the committee does want is for your SSR report to show context, linkage between the appendix sections, and proof that you are aware of cause and effect of variables. It is more important to show linkage between data analysis, conclusions and actions. There are ways to show linkage between descriptive as well as parametric components.
When you generate data points from...